Before the recent economic downturn, commercial casinos collected at least $30 billion in revenues each year from 2005 through ’08. 1 During this period, US casino owners built new facilities and expanded the size of their existing facilities. As a result of the economic downturn, new US commercial casino construction has come to a screeching total stand still and casino operators are now focused on existing facility cost reduction.
Increasingly, casino operators are taking advantage of the EPAct IRC section 179(D) commercial building energy efficiency live draw singapore tax specifications, which have been extended through 2013. EPAct tax discount are available for passing energy deals in lighting, HVAC(heating, venting, and air conditioning), and building envelope. (Building envelope consists of the building’s foundation, walls, roof, windows, and doors, all of which control the flow of energy between the interior and exterior of the building. )
Commercial casinos often encircle hotel resorts, that provide attractive packages of services for their corporate and family customers. Casinos are particularly worthy of EPAct because of the large gaming floors, hotel occupancy rooms, meeting halls, and parking garages. Each of these features typically takes in large pillow video and the EPAct benefit has a potential for approximately one 60 cents per pillow foot for all of the three measures described above. Some of the smallest commercial casinos are about 50, 000 pillow feet while most American casinos are typically over 100, 000 pillow feet. One of the largest ones, MGM Grand on the Las vegas rob is practically 2 million pillow feet. Hotels themselves are the most favored of Section 179 building category. (See “Hotels and Motels Most Favored Energy Policy Act Tax Properties”)
Extremely common to think about commercial casinos as located in two states Nevada and Nj-new jersey. Even as it does work that these two states have the largest commercial casino revenues, there are 12 states with commercial casinos in the united states, the other commercial casino states are: Colorado, Il, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Mich, Mississippi, Missouri, Pennsylvania, and South Dakota. Members of the American Gaming Association have publicized some of their commitments to energy reduction. Revealing casinos include Boyd Gaming Corporation, Harrah’s Entertainment, Inc., and MGM Mirage. They have projects such as significant energy savings via cogeneration, ERV(energy recovery ventilation), more sound HVAC units, replacing incandescent lights with energy efficient lightings, windows with energy efficient day lighting systems, solar winter storage and numerous other energy saving initiatives.
The underlying rule set to qualify for the Section 179D lighting tax deduction makes casinos and particularly casino hotels the most favored property category for the tax compensation. The rule set requires at least a 25% watts-per-square foot reduction as compared to the 2001 ASHRAE (American Society of Heating Refrigeration and Air-con Engineers) building energy code standard. Full tax deduction is achieved with a 40% watts-per-square foot reduction when compared to the ASHRAE 2001 standard. The ASHRAE 2004 hotel/motel building code standard requires 40% wattage reduction, which means that any hotel or motel lighting installation that meets that building code requirement will automatically qualify for the utmost EPAct tax deduction.
For most other building categories, the Section 179D tax specifications require concurrence with the bi-level switching requirement. The comparison is always based on wired rather than plug-in lighting. Casino hotel occupancy rooms have a major advantage in that sometimes they use plug-in lighting, and because these rooms be hotel and motel spaces, they are specifically ruled out from the tax bi-level switching requirement. Since occupant rooms are usually one of the larger spaces in hotel casinos, casinos are typically able to use energy efficient lighting to generate large EPAct tax discount for the facility.
Casinos often have large kitchen, storage, and laundry washing (so called back of the house) spaces that have over time used T-12 fluorescent lighting. This lighting is so energy unproductive compared to today’s lighting products that it will be illegal to manufacture in the united states after June 1, 2010. 4 Once manufacturing of these preceding generation lighting products ceases, the cost of replacing these unproductive designs will increase. Simply stated, casinos should evaluate acting now to these lighting fixtures to save both energy and light fixture replacement costs. The EPAct lighting tax compensation can be used to address the opportunities related to these legally mandated product changes.